Nanda南大N101 T5T6
This course is our department’s biweekly seminar. We’ll invite speakers to share their research, professional experiences, and career advice. First-year grad students are required to take the course for credit. But everyone, in or not in our department, is welcome to sit in. You can sign up for our weekly newsletter to get talk info in your inbox. Just follow this li<x>nk: https://newsletter.cc.nthu.edu.tw/nthu-list/index.php/zh/home-zh-tw/listid-67- 延續「書報討論一」,本學期我們一樣會有數次沙龍講座,各小組也會繼續完成自己提出的研究計畫。如果你有修「書報討論一」,那,對,就是你想的那樣,舊的課綱拿出來看就可以了。
Course keywords: 心理學, 講座, 跨領域, 批判性思考, 獨立研究 (Ver. 2024/2/9) 一、課程說明 (Course Description) This course is our department’s biweekly seminars. We’ll invite speakers to share their research, professional experiences, and career advice. First-year grad students are required to take the course for credit. But everyone, in or not in our department, is welcome to sit in. You can sign up for our weekly newsletter to get talk info in your inbox. Just follow this link! Or copy this url directly: https://newsletter.cc.nthu.edu.tw/nthu-list/index.php/zh/home-zh-tw/listid-67- 二、指定用書 (Text Books) No. 三、參考書籍 (References) No. 四、教學方式 (Teaching Method) Course format: In addition to 1) attending invited talks, students who take the course for credit are required to 2) write talk “previews” before coming to talks, 3) complete the research projects they started last semester, and 4) participate in actual research studies on Sona as participants. I explain these one by one below. -- There’ll be 7 invited talks this semester. I’ll take attendance. You need to participate in at least 6 invited talks “plus the presentation day,” in order to pass the course. So, mark your calendar now. If you face any difficulty anytime as we go in fulfilling this requirement, feel free to let me know and we’ll sort it out case by case. -- You’re required to send in a “talk preview” no later than 72 hours before an invited talk (i.e., on Saturdays), and you need to collect at least 6 previews over the semester. That is, you can only miss one out of the 7 talks scheduled. In a talk preview, you’ll answer three questions: 1) If you’re to pick two keywords for (some of) the representative work of the upcoming speaker, what’d the words be? Do a little research on the speaker and write down the keywords. 2) What do the keywords you choose mean? Do a little research and explain them in a few sentences. 3) Why’d you wanna know more about the speaker’s work (yes, you do)? Write down 2 reasons in a sensible manner. -- Continuing what you started last semester, you’ll finish your group research projects and present them in a class toward the end of semester. All members of the same groups will get the same baseline scores. I’ll then adjust them based on your peer reviews. See grading scheme below for more info. -- To expose you to research, the course requires you to take part in real research studies as participants and collect 3 participation credits over the semester. See grading scheme below for more info. Course website: The course website is located on eLearn. Announcements and course materials will be posted there. You will also find supplementary reading, if any, on eLearn. Attendance: I’ll take attendance. You’ll sign the attendance sheet as last semester. Communication: Everyone is welcome to send me messages “on eLearn,” to request an appointment, ask questions, share your thoughts and concerns about the course. I will try my best to respond to you within two business days. Office hours: Class time on “proj. days” -- I encourage you to take advantage of office hours at least once during this semester. Office hours are a great opportunity to clarify course material and ask questions regarding assignments. -- You’re welcome to just walk in during the designated time. I however would ask you for a favor: Whenever possible, message me before you come, telling me what I can do for you, what questions/suggestions you have etc. Just so I can be better prepared and make our meetings as efficient and meaningful as possible. Also, that prevents you from bumping into others, for their, your own privacy. Expectations: -- Please be respectful of your fellow students and silence your phone. -- Please be responsible for your learning by budgeting your time, being on time and prepared, and seeking assistance when needed. -- You are responsible for all information presented in class, even if you have an excused absence for a particular day. If you are going to miss a class, plan ahead to get the material from classmates or me, before or after the class. AI policies: -- I do love to see people, students included of course, to start harvesting the power of AI. So try it whenever you see fit. -- However, you sign up for the course, or generally, enroll in the program for a reason: to get the training I, as well as the program, may offer. So, at the same time, whenever you’re thinking about using AI to assist you, ask yourself, are you losing any training because of AI? It’s not me who don’t wanna see AI covering you. It’s you who don’t wanna see AI taking away your opportunity to learn. -- Indeed, ask around, then you’ll know you don’t need to do this much – I mean, using AI – just to get ahead of others in this class. Everyone putting in fair work, that is, pretty much literally everyone, gets an A in the end. So whether to call your AI in really is about you yourself, not you in comparison to others. 五、教學進度 (Syllabus) (subject to change as we go) 1) 2/20 Course overview, presentation order, group member rosters Read the syllabus before class! 2) 2/27 Invited talk: 謝伯讓(台灣大學) title tbd 3) 3/05 Proj. day 4) 3/12 Invited talk: 謝亦泰(台灣科技大學) title tbd 5) 3/19 Proj. day 6) 3/26 Invited talk: 張俊彥(台灣大學) title tbd 7) 4/02 Invited talk: 郭乃文(成功大學)or proj. day title tbd 8) 4/09 Invited talk: 郭乃文(成功大學)or proj. day title tbd 9) 4/16 Invited talk: 郭乃文(成功大學)or proj. day title tbd 10) 4/23 Invited talk: 熊欣華(台灣大學) title tbd 11) 4/30 Invited talk: Proj. day 12) 5/07 Invited talk: 陶振超(陽明交通大學) title tbd 13) 5/14 Proj. day 14) 5/21 Invited talk: 董芳武(清華大學) title tbd 15) 5/28 Proj. day 16) 6/04 Proj. presentations (Research participation due by class time) 17) 6/11 No class (Final proposal due by class time) 六、成績考核 (Evaluation) Attendance: To pass the course, you’ll need to attend at least 6 invited talks plus the project presentation day. Talk previews: To pass the course, you’ll need to send in at least 6 non-effectively-blank talk previews “in time” over the semester. The previews will be graded using the following scale: 0, effectively no submission; 1, fair; 2 insightful. See the grading scheme below for more info. I don’t usually accept late submissions, but if you need one for a good reason, let me know. Group research project: The project grade will include 3 parts: an in-class presentation, a final written report, and peer reviews. The first two will be the same for everyone in the same group. The peer review will be an “optional,” opened-ended survey in which you can inform me about any of your teammates’ investments in your shared project. I may adjust people’s project grades based on the reviews they’ve got. -- Toward the end of the semester, you’ll give a 20-min presentation on your work followed by a 10-min Q&A, like in a real conference. You can, as many will, use slides, but this is not required. Most importantly, take the chance to get feedback from your peers to really polish your final product. I’ll prepare snacks and drinks. I mean, it’s a mini-conference. -- Finally, the written research report, due in a week after the presentation. The work should be an empirical paper, in the format of a common empirical paper, including all common sections you see in a published psychological research article. Your paper should be at least 2500 words long (excluding bibliography), and formatted. You’re welcome to follow the APA style; that’s the go-to, but not required. The goal of formatting is merely to help you organize information and to help readers (i.e., me) see the organization. I won’t check your format like a bored librarian. -- With the written report, “everyone” can submit a peer review, in which you can comment on your teammates’ contributions. I may adjust people’s grades accordingly if needed. Research participation: To expose you to research, the course requires you to take part in real research studies as participants and collect 3 participation credits on Sona by the last class, i.e., 6/4 1:20 pm, so you can actually feel what psyc research is like. -- Sona is the online system in which you will find and sign up for studies, and then track your participation records. It’s here: https://nthu.sona-systems.com/ -- 1 credit on Sona usually means 1-hour participation, but the rate sometimes varies depending on other factors, e.g., task difficulty. -- As encouragement, completing the about-15-minute prescreening survey by March (i.e., by 3/1 12:00 am) will give you 1 (hour-worth = 0.3 original + 0.7 bonus) credit. Doing it later gives you 0.3 credit (i.e., about 18-min effort). -- In case you can’t or don’t want to participate in enough studies for 3 research participation credits, there are more than 6 sets of learning materials and quizzes on eLearn for existing studies in the literature. Reading/watching/listening to a set of materials and scoring 75 or higher out of 100 on the corresponding quiz will give you 0.5 research participation credit, so if necessary, you can complete the whole participation assignment this way. See the grading scheme below. To pass the course, you’ll need to send in at least 6 talk previews “in time” over the semester. The previews will be graded using the following scale: 0, no submission; 1, fair; 2 insightful. See the grading scheme below for more info. I accept late submissions, with a penalty. Late submissions may still give you some points, less effectively, but they may be the points you need. Let me know if you plan to do a makeup preview. Late submissions won’t be counted without my permission. -- With the written report, “everyone” can submit a peer review, in which you can comment on your teammates’ contributions. I may adjust people’s grades accordingly if needed. Course grade: -- Talk previews for 45% course grade; use the formula: this part of the course grade = 70 + 7 x # of 2-pt “insightful” notes Yes, you get more than 100 here if you get more than 4 “insightful” -- Project presentation for 22.5% course grade -- Project report for 22.5% course grade -- Research participation for 10% course grade; use the formula: this part of the course grade = 10 + 45 x # of credits W22; 5 x (# of credits)2 Yes, you may get more than 100 here with > 3 credits and the grade reaches max with 4.5 credits 七、可連結之網頁位址 https://elearn.nthu.edu.tw/course/view.php?id=31244
MON | TUE | WED | THU | FRI | |
08:00108:50 | |||||
09:00209:50 | |||||
10:10311:00 | |||||
11:10412:00 | |||||
12:10n13:00 | |||||
13:20514:10 | |||||
14:20615:10 | |||||
15:30716:20 | |||||
16:30817:20 | |||||
17:30918:20 | |||||
18:30a19:20 | |||||
19:30b20:20 | |||||
20:30c21:20 |
[心得] 百年來的中華民國對外關係 張棋炘時間Sun Jan 30 10:58:53 2022 課名:百年來的中華民國對外關係 科號:11010 GE 111300 老師:張棋炘 課本:無 課別:通識 社會科學領域 學分:2 涼度:★★★★ 甜度:★★★★★ 建議先修課程:無 課程內容\簡介 本課程將從一個新國家-中華民國-於1912年的誕生開始,探討前一代政權所留下的遺緒和 深刻影響,以及新國家誕生後參與決策或實際的 領導者如何運籌帷幄,再加上伴隨而來的內 部社會在思想、觀念、體制上的連串變化並從而影響對外決策;更重要的,外在國際環境的 強大 衝擊,特別是強權彼此間的對抗與弱肉強食所導致的一連串事件更進一步影響--甚至 是決定--了這個國家在二十世紀大半的命運。藉由 快速、客觀地檢視歷史,翻轉過去悲情 式的思考,改以國際關係的核心分析架構,帶領學生以嶄新的思維回顧與學習中華民國的對 外關係史。 上課方式: 第一堂課會分組,分組方式是老師及助教會先分好,同一科系會盡量分在不同組,每組的男 生女生人數也會盡量平均。上課方式是用PPT,會講很多故事跟實例來佐證,也會加入每個禮 拜的國際時事及國內政治素材,每堂課幾乎都有小組討論。基本上會教一些外交常見的手段 、外交史、外交實務等等。內容豐富,老師上課也很認真。回家作業有四五次,老師會要你 看一些影片或文章,再寫幾百字的心得,或是坐一下政治意向的調查,問你的國家認同及原 因之類的。學期中還能參觀海會,或是其他兩岸服務單位。這學期我們是去海基會,原本以 為就是安排個導覽人員帶我們進去晃晃,沒想到竟然是海基會副主任祕書親自帶領每位處室 的代表人員在大會議室和我們舉行座談。除了可以了解海基會的運作內容之外,還有發問跟 對談時間,是個非常難得的機會。 給分: https://i.imgur.com/Muh9CGU.jpg 考試作業型態: 主要考核成績65%基本上就是期中報告,30%的期末報告其實就是期中報告的文字檔(需要300 0字以上),所以只要期中報告好好做,總成績的65%並不難拿。期中報告的主題每一組都不一 樣,不過都是跟台灣的外交相關,有外交決策機制的介紹,邦交國的介紹,也有香港一國兩 制與台灣的關係,以及不同總統的外交政策差異等等。期中報告也是老師盯得最兇的,所以 組員好不好就差很多。如果上台報告講的不好,老師會毫不留情的直接開嘴,非常丟臉。要 注意在準備報告的時候一定要跟老師私下約時間討論報告,老師對報告都有既定內容的設定 ,如果沒有照老師的想法做報告會被電的非常慘,所以簡而言之老師叫你們做什麼,大家照 做就對了。35%的平時成績除了作業要準時繳交,要言之有物之外,老師非常看重上課的參與 。因為這堂課是跟外交、政治有關,本來就很需要大家的互動以及討論。如果上課的討論參 與度不高,可以透過下課之後的心得回饋來彌補,不常發言發表意見或滑手機或沒在上課的 平時成績會很低。 老師的喜好、個性: 老師上課很活潑,也很幽默,不過忌諱學生翹課、遲到、睡覺、玩手機,被抓到會扣總成績 ,不過扣幾分不知道。老師有話直說,尤其在準備期中報告的時候心臟要強一點,他有可能 會直接噴爆你,把批評得一文不值。他的說法是不教而殺謂之虐,但是也是有同學受不了。 不管如何,老師非常敬業,對自己的教學很認真,也努力的讓教材跟時事結合,也會穿插一 些時事梗還有迷因圖。此外老師也很關心學生的學習狀況,他會記住所有學生名字,同學的 心得回饋老師都會看,也會回答同學的疑問。 給加簽嗎? 會 給到教室滿人。 補充: 老師不給二退,因為小組這樣會因為二退的人期末報告很麻煩。還是有人吃D的,他也不太接 受談成績,因為老師說他改變想法的機率非常非常低。雖然之前幾屆有同學抱怨老師有既定 的政治立場,但是我覺得老師在課堂上對政治的評判都是站得住腳的,不管是從邏輯上或是 學術上皆然。所以其實不用太擔心政治立場的問題,我一個學期上下來每次都覺得老師講的 很有道理XD。把大綱印下來,第一堂課帶去會加分。老師也滿喜歡送東西的,這學期有發放 行事曆、筆記本、紅包袋之類的。這邊附上老師歸納出拿到成績比較不好的原因,只要不要 踩到這些地雷,要拿A+應該不難。 1.期末報告成績不佳(特別是:未交或遲交、繳交錯誤、缺乏具體建議、或者從字數判斷只 想交差了事) 2.學期作業應繳未繳(最常發生的狀況) 3.上課沈默,雖參與小組討論,卻很少公開發言、存在感低,對於提供事後心得繳交這個方 案也興趣缺缺 4.上課曾經偷偷使用手機被我制止(或被助教另外註記)、上課(或參訪)打瞌睡或不專心 聽課情況明顯、上課經常未能準時抵達教室,或被老師直接叫醒。 總成績/班上排名:A+ 1/39 T分數: 54.11 成績分布: https://i.imgur.com/hzq1ihL.jpg
[心得] 百年來的中華民國對外關係 張棋炘時間Thu Feb 18 12:52:42 2021 課名:百年來的中華民國對外關係 科號:10910GE 111300 老師:張棋炘 課本: 課別:社會科學領域(語文、某系選修、某系必修、通識某向度) 學分:2 涼度:★★★★☆(滿分五分,空心代表半分!請自行增減!) 甜度:★★★★★ 建議先修課程: 課程內容\簡介: 上課主要是講一些分析國際情勢的方法,或是一些國關的基本知識 中華民國的政府組織、歷史、外交情形、總統等等 上課方式: powerpoint為主 會有小組討論 給分: 期中報告(小組上台+紙本) 35% 期末報告(個人紙本) 30% 作業 15% 上課表現 20% 考試作業型態: 作業會看當週內容,主要是心得、時事或是一些問題發想 上課表現不一定是上課發言,可以在課後寫心得或任何看法上傳ilms 一樣會列入上課表現 小組分組第一堂課會分好,隨機分,教授會讓認識的或是同科系拆開 期中報告題目用抽的,會有陸生訪談跟其他國關的topic 老師的喜好、個性: 老師上課很活潑,不過忌諱學生翹課、遲到、睡覺、玩手機, 被抓到會扣總成績,不過扣幾分不知道 給加簽嗎? 會 給到教室滿人 補充: 1. 印syllabus,第一堂課帶去會加分 2. 上課沒有太多政治立場,也不太會偏袒,powerpoint有迷因XD 3. 教授滿喜歡送東西的(?),我這學期拿到一本書+行事曆 4. 如果對這個領域有興趣的話,真心推薦大家去,教授閱歷我覺得算豐富, 應該可以聽得滿快樂(?) 總成績/班上排名:A+ 1/39 成績: 成績分布: ↓每組人數 A+ 30.8 % ( 12 ) A 41 % ( 16 ) A- 20.5 % ( 8 ) B+ 7.7 % ( 3 ) B % ( ) B- % ( ) C+ % ( ) C % ( ) C- % ( ) D以下 % ( )
[心得] 百年來的中華民國對外關係 張棋炘時間Sat Sep 12 22:29:24 2020 課名:百年來的中華民國對外關係 科號:10820 GE111300 老師:張棋炘 課本:無 課別:社會通識(語文、某系選修、某系必修、通識某向度) 學分:2 涼度:★★★☆ 3.5(滿分五分,空心代表半分!請自行增減!) 甜度:★★★★★ 5 建議先修課程:無 課程內容\簡介: 上課方式: (板書?powerpoint?實地參訪?小組討論?) 教室第一堂課會分組,分組方式就第一堂課隨便坐之後老師在隨便分。 (所以跟認識的坐一起也不一定一組就是了) 上課方式是用ppt,會講很多故事跟實例來佐證。 基本上會教一些外交常見的手段or一些故事,內容其實還蠻豐富的,老師上課也很認真。 回家作業有三四次,老師會要你看一些影片or文章,再寫幾百字(吧 的心得還有看法,就 是 期末會有小組分組報告,就是第一堂課分組的小組,要做一個主題(ex.台灣醫療健保對國 外 學期中還能參觀海基會,或是其他兩岸服務單位,我們是去海基會,還跟有些他們的人員 有發問跟對談時間,是個難得的機會。 PPT 給分: (有唸就有分?甜不甜?幾分耕耘幾分收獲?) 小組期末報告+作業+上課態度(這很重要) 理論上超級甜 但為會給涼度3.5是因為老師很注重上課態度跟出席,上課不能玩手機或做其他事,需要 認真專心的上課。 老師希望學生能有收穫,而不是讓通識淪為混分灌GPA的工具,所以打算上課時間做其他 事的人可以不用選了。 作業需要花一些時間寫。 考試作業型態: (數量的多寡、還是繳交報告?) 回家打word檔文字心得+期末小組報告 老師的喜好、個性: (與同學相處融洽?還是嚴禁遲到?) 給加簽嗎? 少數,就50個滿了就滿了,不太給簽。 補充:喔對老師不給二退喔,因為小組這樣會因為二退的人期末報告很麻煩 還有上課要常常發言,他會記住所有學生名字,不常發言發表意見或滑手機或沒在上課的 話就比較麻煩了。 還是有人吃C的,他也不接受談成績。 但總之大推的,有收穫又甜甜。 總成績/班上排名:A+ 1/48 成績:A+ 成績分布: ↓每組人數 A+ 64.6% ( 31 ) A 29.2% ( 14 ) A- 2.1% ( 1 ) B+ % ( ) B % ( ) B- % ( ) C+ % ( ) C 2.0% ( 2 ) C- % ( ) D以下 % ( ) https://i.imgur.com/IkCfKKu.jpg
此為16週課程。
限心諮系碩士班博士班
-
-
-
-